*Furstenberg Law has merged with Doogue + George Defence Lawyers

Call (03) 9131 2000

Distribution of an Intimate Image

Need a Melbourne criminal lawyer?

Distribution of an Intimate Image

The increase of the use and reach of technology generally has resulted in the expansion of its use in gender-based violence.  Such technology is being used to facilitate or commit sexual violence or harassment against (predominantly) women.

In response to the increasing prevalence of ‘revenge porn’, the Victorian Parliament passed the Crimes Amendment (Sexual Offences and Other Matters) Bill 2014 on 15 October 2014, which amended the Summary Offences Act 1966 (Vic), and the Crimes Act 1958 (Vic).

The legislation creates the new offences of distribution of an intimate image (section 41DA) and threat to distribute an intimate image (section 41DB) under the Summary Offences Act 1966 (Vic).

Additionally, it creates four exceptions to the offences of publication or transmission of child pornography to exclude young people who participate in consensual ‘sexting’ from such child pornography offences.

In relation to the offence of distribution of an intimate image, contrary to section 41DA of the Summary Offences Act 1966 (Vic), the prosecution must establish the following beyond reasonable doubt:

  1. That the accused intentionally distributed an image of the complainant to a person other than the complainant; and
  2. The distribution of the image is contrary to community standards of acceptable conduct.

 

In relation to the offence of threat to distribute an intimate image, contrary to section 41DB of the Summary Offences Act 1966 (Vic), the prosecution must establish the following beyond reasonable doubt:

  1. That the accused made a threat to the complainant to distribute an intimate image of the complainant or another person;
  2. The distribution of the image would be contrary to community standards of acceptable conduct; and
  3. The accused intended that the complainant believe, or believed that the complainant would probably believe, that the accused would carry out the threat.

 

‘Contrary to community standards of acceptable conduct’ in relation to these offences is defined by reference to a variety of factors, such as the nature and content of the image, the circumstances in which the image was captured and distributed and the vulnerability of the subject in the image.

The offences do not apply to intimate images of adults who have ‘expressly or impliedly consented, or could reasonably be considered to have expressly or implied consented’ to the ‘distribution of the intimate image’ and the ‘manner in which the intimate image was distributed’.

The maximum penalty for the offence of distribution of an intimate image is 2 years imprisonment and the maximum penalty for the offence of threat to distribute an intimate image is 1 year imprisonment

Need a criminal lawyer? Contact us here.

Other sexual offences

Ruwan Jayamanna
Ruwan Jayamanna
Google Review
Read More
"I highly recommend Avi and his Team for your legal matters. Don't hesitate - just call them. Avi was fantastic - working through my complex legal issues and bringing about an outcome which was virtually beyond my wildest expectations! Thank you so much Avi - I'm extremely grateful for your kind, calm, knowledgable, supportive, responsive and empathetic demeanour, and interaction with me during easily the worst stage of my life. And of course for the outcome."
Katrina McMahon
Katrina McMahon
Google Review
Read More
"I had the comfort of being represented by Holly Boylan during a recent sledge and application for IVO about me. Despite my stress, Holly was the ultimate professional, understanding and took the entire situation in her stride. The matter was resolved promptly and the correct outcome of complete withdrawal occurred. Always available to my questions, Hollys manner was astute, caring and professional."
Daniel Wood
Daniel Wood
Google Review
Read More
"Holly was absolutely brilliant to deal with...Furstenberg Law really delve into our situation and went above and beyond to over deliver on the speed of the desired outcome - would recommend without hesitation."
Daniel Thaxter
Daniel Thaxter
Google Review
Read More
"I am incredibly grateful for your hard work and effort you put in with not only my legal matter but also by putting me at ease emotionally. "
eliza dewey
eliza dewey
Google Review
Read More
"My life is almost the same as it was before I got in trouble with the law thanks to him, and the way he helped me was exceptional."
Kath H
Kath H
Google Review
Read More
"He is such a wonderful caring person and worked so hard in getting me the best possible outcome. He was professional, knowledgeable and determined and I have no hesitation in recommending his services."
Anmol Chahal
Anmol Chahal
Google Review
Read More
"My experience with this firm was fantastic. Holly Boylan was my lawyer, and not only did she achieve the best possible outcome for me, but throughout the experience kept me informed about what was happening with regular updates. I highly recommend Holly for your legal matters."
Nikkii Shaw
Nikkii Shaw
Google Review
Read More
"Can't thank Avi Furstenberg and his team at furstenberg law for the help, guidance and support shown. I couldn't have gotten a better outcome from my case, Avi is exceptional and professional at his job. I highly recommend using Furstenberg Law and Avi for their services!"
Previous
Next

Send a private message