Distribution of an Intimate Image

Need a Melbourne criminal lawyer?

Distribution of an Intimate Image

The increase of the use and reach of technology generally has resulted in the expansion of its use in gender-based violence.  Such technology is being used to facilitate or commit sexual violence or harassment against (predominantly) women.

In response to the increasing prevalence of ‘revenge porn’, the Victorian Parliament passed the Crimes Amendment (Sexual Offences and Other Matters) Bill 2014 on 15 October 2014, which amended the Summary Offences Act 1966 (Vic), and the Crimes Act 1958 (Vic).

The legislation creates the new offences of distribution of an intimate image (section 41DA) and threat to distribute an intimate image (section 41DB) under the Summary Offences Act 1966 (Vic).

Additionally, it creates four exceptions to the offences of publication or transmission of child pornography to exclude young people who participate in consensual ‘sexting’ from such child pornography offences.

In relation to the offence of distribution of an intimate image, contrary to section 41DA of the Summary Offences Act 1966 (Vic), the prosecution must establish the following beyond reasonable doubt:

  1. That the accused intentionally distributed an image of the complainant to a person other than the complainant; and
  2. The distribution of the image is contrary to community standards of acceptable conduct.

 

In relation to the offence of threat to distribute an intimate image, contrary to section 41DB of the Summary Offences Act 1966 (Vic), the prosecution must establish the following beyond reasonable doubt:

  1. That the accused made a threat to the complainant to distribute an intimate image of the complainant or another person;
  2. The distribution of the image would be contrary to community standards of acceptable conduct; and
  3. The accused intended that the complainant believe, or believed that the complainant would probably believe, that the accused would carry out the threat.

 

‘Contrary to community standards of acceptable conduct’ in relation to these offences is defined by reference to a variety of factors, such as the nature and content of the image, the circumstances in which the image was captured and distributed and the vulnerability of the subject in the image.

The offences do not apply to intimate images of adults who have ‘expressly or impliedly consented, or could reasonably be considered to have expressly or implied consented’ to the ‘distribution of the intimate image’ and the ‘manner in which the intimate image was distributed’.

The maximum penalty for the offence of distribution of an intimate image is 2 years imprisonment and the maximum penalty for the offence of threat to distribute an intimate image is 1 year imprisonment

Need a criminal lawyer? Contact us here.

Other sexual offences

Minh Le
Minh Le
Google Review
Read More
"I thank Mark Martoccia for a truly life changing outcome. Thank you from the bottom of my heart."
Joanne Cirelli
Joanne Cirelli
Google Review
Read More
"I highly recommend Furstenberg Law I was represented better than l ever imagined by Mark Martoccia and his lovely assistant Oliver which resulted in a winning outcome."
Daniel Thaxter
Daniel Thaxter
Google Review
Read More
"I am incredibly grateful for your hard work and effort you put in with not only my legal matter but also by putting me at ease emotionally. "
eliza dewey
eliza dewey
Google Review
Read More
"My life is almost the same as it was before I got in trouble with the law thanks to him, and the way he helped me was exceptional."
Georgia Bailey
Georgia Bailey
Google Review
Read More
"Could not recommend Mark Martoccia enough from Furstenberg Law. He was so great to speak with and so helpful when working with us at such a difficult time in our lives."
Fxdls
Fxdls
Google Review
Read More
"By far the best lawyers I have ever dealt with, I used the highest google rated lawyer in Melbourne before Mark And Avi and these guys were leaps and bounds better!"
Jaydan Eccles
Jaydan Eccles
Google Review
Read More
"Mark Martoccia from Frustenberg Law was great over the late 2 years of dealing with my case and got all the charges dropped. I couldn’t of asked for a better lawyer."
D Wang
D Wang
Google Review
Read More
"The outcome Mark achieved for me was beyond excellent and demonstrates all the hard work and care that he put into the case, he is hero to me. Thank you so much Mark."
Kath H
Kath H
Google Review
Read More
"He is such a wonderful caring person and worked so hard in getting me the best possible outcome. He was professional, knowledgeable and determined and I have no hesitation in recommending his services."
Previous
Next